*************************************************************************************** standardized chart ofpoints earned per sectionsection point valueslo point values432110107 H e a l t h M e d i c a l
The evidence based research paper must be 4 to 5 pages in length. I have also attached the article that must be used for this paper.
THIS IS HOW THE TOPICS SHOULD APPEAR
To effectively write this paper, the rubric must be present and FREQUENTLY referenced to make certain you are capturing every detail to write a scholarly paper.
- Introduction Overview
- Description of the Study |Demographics of the Sample Population
- Methodology of the Study.
- Data Gathering Method
- Clinical Significance of Research Findings | Improves patient outcomes |Cultural, ethical, psycho-social implications
- Relevance to clinical nursing practice | Promotion of Health Recovery | Community Support Service | Summary
100 points |
Must submit “pre rubric” checklist questionnaire to confirm you have selected an appropriate nursing research article. |
Can be national or international Nursing Journal article written by a nurse as lead or secondary author. |
The research article should be no more than 6 years old. (special consideration will be contemplated) |
Students must read the research journal article before completing the “pre rubric” checklist questionnaire. |
If article is not approved. Will need to request appointment time with the appropriate instructor. |
DROP BOX “PRE RUBIC” CHECK LIST QUESTIONNAIRE (SCORES ARE 100 OR ZERO.. THIS IS NOT A WEIGHED GRADE)
SUBMIT THIS FORMAT TO PRE RUBIC DROP BOX CHECK LIST QUESTIONNAIRE – TO confirm the article selected was appropriate
Student’s Name |
Name of Nursing Journal |
Publication Year| |Volume |Number| Page |
Abbreviate two sentences that describes the article. |
Does the nursing research article gives you a description of the study? |
List method of Study |
Can you identify the clinical significance of the research findings how it can improve patient care outcomes? |
Professor accepts article. If not accepted appointment with professor |
Accepted Unacceptable |
|||||||
SAMPLE James Gordon |
Heart & Lung |
2015. 11(3) 210-219. |
Discussed the impact of lipids as it leads to hypertension. A contemplation of multiple studies (meta-analysis) used to conclude the results of the findings. |
Yes |
Meta-analysis |
Yes |
Accepted Unacceptable |
EVIDENCE BASED RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE
Points | Scores |
EVIDENCE BASED RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE |
EXEMPLARY |
PROFICIENT |
MARGINAL |
UNACCEPTABLE |
Each section of the paper must be identified by title. |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
15 |
Introduction | Overview Robust detailed overview
|
The overview is robustly or thoroughly discussed. |
The essential components of the overview are identified. |
A basic minimal description of the overview is stated. |
Unable to state the basic premise of the overview of the research paper (premise: a statement which is inferred or follows as a conclusion) |
15 |
Description of the Study State the identified phenomenon studied in the research article.
|
Clearly states the identified phenomenon studied in the research article. |
Identified some aspects of the phenomenon studied in the research article. |
A weak identification of the phenomenon studied in the research article. |
An incomplete and unfocused identification of the phenomenon studied in the research article. |
15 |
Discuss the Data Gathering Method i.e. Surveys, interviews, experiments, questionnaire, meta-analysis (meta-analysis: combination of multiple statistical studies addressing the same question) etc. |
Clearly discuss the method used for gathering data in the research article. |
Discuss to some degree the method used for data gathering in the research article. |
The method of data gathering is not adequately discussed |
Incomplete and unfocused discussion regarding method used for data gathering. |
15 |
Clinical Significance of Research Findings Describe the clinical significance of the article and how it can improve patient outcomes based on the research findings. Described the clinical significance of the research findings how it can impact the patient’s outcome culturally, ethically, and psycho-socially. |
Clearly describes the clinical significance of the research findings how it can improve patient care outcomes. Clearly described the clinical significance of the research findings how it can impact the patient’s outcome culturally, ethically, and psycho-socially. |
Some description of the clinical significance of the research findings is discussed as how it can improve patient care clinical outcomes. Described to some degree clinical significance of the research findings how it can impact the patient’s outcome culturally, ethically, and psycho-socially. |
The clinical significance of the research findings is not adequately discussed based on the research findings how it can improve patient care outcomes. The clinical significance of the research finding does not adequately describe how it would impact the patient’s outcome culturally, ethically, and psycho-socially. |
The narrative written regarding the clinical significance of the research findings is incomplete and unfocused and it does not give an explanation how the findings can improve patient care outcomes. The statement written about the clinical significance of the research findings is incomplete and does not describe how it would impact the patient’s outcome culturally, ethically, and psycho-socially. |
15 |
Utilization or relevance to your nursing clinical practice Describe how the knowledge gained from critique of this research article can or should be used in your Clinical practice. State how the knowledge gained from the critique will be used to Promote health and recovery.
Identify a community support service to facilitate a positive patient outcome. (id name. physical address, email. internet address and telephone number if available.)
SUMMARY: recap the basic overview of the paper |
Thoroughly describes and directly ties in how the knowledge gained from this research article can be implemented in future clinical nursing practice. Thoroughly describes how the knowledge gained can be used to promote health and recovery for the patient. Clearly identified community support service to facilitate positive patient outcomes. Clearly summarizes in one strong paragraphs (5-6 sentences per paragraph) |
Narrative lent some insight how the research article can be used in future clinical nursing practice. Adequately describes how the knowledge gained can be used to promote health and recovery for the patient. Adequately, stated a community support service to facilitate a positive patient outcomes. Clearly summarizes in one paragraph with 3-4 sentences per paragraph) |
Narrative made weak connections to the research article how it can be utilized in future nursing practice. A short-abbreviated description was used to described how the knowledge gained from the research article can be used to promote health and recovery for the patient. Partially, identify a community support service to facilitate positive patient outcomes. Summary includes 3 or less sentences.overview |
No direct connection was made how the research article can be used in future nursing practice. Did not adequately described how the knowledge gained from the research article could be used to promote health and recovery for the patient.6 Insufficient contact information offered to locate a community support service to facilitate positive patient outcomes. Summary of topic insufficient. |
15 |
Writing Style The critiques should be well written as that your ideas should be clear, concise, with no serious error with sentence structure and word usage. Absence of serious grammatical errors, spelling and proper capitalization when appropriate. |
Clear, concise, with no serious error with sentence structure and word usage. Absence of serious grammatical errors, spelling and proper capitalization utilized appropriately. |
Basically, a good critique with few errors with sentence structure and word usage. A few non serious grammatical errors, spelling and overall proper capitalization is utilized. |
The critiques with many errors with sentence structure and word usage. Too many grammatical errors, spelling and improper capitalization is utilized. |
The critiques have numerous and distracting errors with sentence structure and word usage. Too many grammatical errors, spelling and improper capitalization is utilized. |
10 |
APA 6th edition Reference |
All cited works and text are done in correct format with no serious error. |
Few cited works and text are done in correct format with few non serious errors. |
Approximately ¼ of the cited work and text are done in incorrect format with few serious errors. |
Less than ¼ of the cited works and text are done in incorrect format with serious errors. |
100 points |
Must complete rubric online to deem an acceptable nursing research article. CRITIQUE ONLY 3-5 PAGES |
Nursing Journal can be national or international; article should be written by a nurse (lead author or secondary author). |
The Nursing journal article critique should be approximately 6 years old or less. |
Students must read the article before completing the rubric questionnaire and before sending it to the appropriate faculty for approval. |
If article is not approved. Will need to request an appointment time with the appropriate faculty member. |
***************************************************************************************
-
Standardized Chart of
Points Earned per Section
Section Point Value
SLO Point Values
4
3
2
1
10
10
7.5
5
2. 5
15
15
11.25
7.5
3.75
20
20
15
10
5
Student Name |
|||||
SCORES |
EVIDENCE BASED RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE |
||||
15 |
Introduction | Overview
|
||||
15 |
Description of the Study
|
||||
15 |
Discuss the Method used for data gathering
|
||||
15 |
Clinical Significance of the Research Findings
|
||||
15 |
Utilization or Relevance to your nursing clinical practice
|
||||
15 |
Writing Style
|
||||
10/ 100 |
|