family nurse practitioner certification intensive review W r i t i n g

family nurse practitioner certification intensive review W r i t i n g

Patient 5 years old came to the clinic presenting symptoms of hand, foot, and mouth disease.

Follow the case presenting answer the questions below. Please follow all steps, and rubric all the time. You can get support from materials and book recommended below.

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

  • Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
  • Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and possible differential diagnosis.
  • What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
  • Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

Textbook(s)

  • McCanceBurns, C. E., Dunn, M. A., Brady, A. M., Starr, B. N., Blosser, G. C., & Garzon, L. D. (2017). Pediatric Primary Care. (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
  • Fitzgerald, A. M. (2017). Nurse Practitioner Certification Examination and Practice Preparation. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company. ISBN: 978-0803660427
  • American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). ISBN: 9781433832154
  • You should have all text books from NUR502, NUR504, NUR600, and NUR 601 for reference for clinicals.
  • Recommended

  • Maria T. Codina Leik N-C, A. (2017). Family nurse practitioner certification intensive review: Fast facts and practice questions (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company
  • Fitzgerald, A. M. (2017). Nurse Practitioner Certification Examination and Practice Preparation. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company. ISBN: 978-0803660427
  • Barkley, T. W., Jr. (2021). Family nurse practitioner certification review/clinical update continuing education course. Barkley & Associates, Inc.
  • Discussion Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts

    5 points
    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

    4 points
    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

    2 points
    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

    1 points
    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

    5 points

    Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    3 points
    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    2 points
    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    1 point
    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

    0 point
    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

    3 points
    Response to Posts of Peers

    2 points
    Distinguished

    Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.

    1 points
    Fair

    Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.

    0 point
    Poor

    Student provided no response to a peer’s post.

    2 points