2005 stanford commencement addressread supplymental materials W r i t i n g
Write a Rhetorical Analysis on this topic:
Read Supplymental Materials before you start to write:
Analyzing Your Audience and Purpose
Thinking Rhetorically About Good Writing
Make sure you satisfy the Grading Criteria below:
Rhetorical Analysis
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
| 5.0 pts
Analysis
Specific, developed analysis and insightful observation.
|
4.0 pts
Analysis
Analysis is generally sound but could be more specific or insightful in some areas.
|
3.0 pts
Analysis
General and/or undeveloped analysis
|
2.0 pts
Analysis
Analysis is sparse and lacks insight.
|
1.0 pts
Analysis
No relevant analysis or insightful observation made.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Details
|
| 5.0 pts
Full Marks
|
5.0 pts
Supporting Details
Support information is related to analysis and supports the topic/subject.
|
4.0 pts
Supporting Details
Support information has minor weakness relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject.
|
3.0 pts
Supporting Details
Support information has major weakness relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject.
|
2.0 pts
Supporting Details
An attempt has been made to add support information, but it is unrelated or confusing.
|
1.0 pts
Supporting Details
Support information is irrelevant or not found.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus
|
| 4.0 pts
Focus
Exhibit no lapses in focus on topic/subject.
|
3.0 pts
Focus
Exhibit minor lapses in focus on topic/subject.
|
2.0 pts
Focus
Exhibit major lapses in focus on topic/subject.
|
1.0 pts
Focus
Fail to establish focus on topic/subject.
|
0.5 pts
Focus
No analytical focus found.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Fluency
|
| 4.0 pts
Full Marks
|
4.0 pts
Writing Fluency
Demonstrate skillful writing fluency, exhibit few or no mechanical errors
|
3.0 pts
Writing Fluency
Demonstrate reasonable writing fluency, exhibit few mechanical errors.
|
2.0 pts
Writing Fluency
Writing fluency is lacking, exhibit several mechanical errors.
|
1.0 pts
Writing Fluency
Demonstrate minimal writing fluency, exhibit numerous mechanical errors.
|
0.5 pts
Writing Fluency
Writing is not fluent—unreadable.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat
|
| 2.0 pts
Format
Sources are cited correctly in the document and on the reference page.
|
1.5 pts
Format
Sources are cited, but there are a few errors in the format.
|
1.0 pts
Format
Sources are cited, but there are several errors in the format.
|
0.5 pts
Format
Some of the sources are not cited and/or the format is not correct
|
0.0 pts
Format
Sources are not cited at all.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
2.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 20.0
|
